Compiler Design: An Expert Overview of Bottom-Up Parsing, Intermediate Code Generation, and Optimization

The compilation process translates source code into executable machine code through a series of well-defined phases. These phases typically include lexical analysis, syntax analysis, semantic analysis, intermediate code generation, code optimization, and final code generation. Among these, syntax analysis, or parsing, plays a crucial role in verifying the grammatical structure of the source program according to the rules of a formal grammar. This phase takes the stream of tokens produced by the lexical analyzer and constructs a hierarchical representation, often in the form of a parse tree or an abstract syntax tree.1
Parsing techniques are broadly categorized into two main approaches: top-down and bottom-up. Top-down parsing begins with the start symbol of the grammar and attempts to derive the input string by applying production rules in a forward direction.1 This method tries to predict the next symbols based on the current non-terminal being expanded and the lookahead in the input stream.3 In contrast, bottom-up parsing starts with the input string of terminals and attempts to reduce it back to the start symbol by applying production rules in reverse.1 This approach recognizes the lowest-level details first and builds up to the overall structure.2 Bottom-up parsing generally offers advantages in handling a wider range of grammars, particularly those with left recursion, which can pose challenges for deterministic top-down parsers.2 Grammars exhibiting left recursion, such as E -> E + T, can lead to infinite loops in top-down parsing strategies that directly translate grammar rules into recursive procedures.9 Bottom-up techniques, by their nature of working from the input towards the start symbol, can accommodate such grammar structures without requiring explicit elimination of left recursion.10

Shift-Reduce Parsing

Shift-reduce parsing is a common and powerful bottom-up parsing technique.7 It operates by performing two fundamental actions: shift and reduce.4 The shift action involves moving the next input token from the input stream onto the parser's stack.4 The parser utilizes a stack to keep track of the portion of the input that has been processed.7 The reduce action occurs when the parser recognizes a sequence of symbols at the top of the stack that matches the right-hand side of a grammar production rule.4 When such a match is found, the parser replaces this sequence with the non-terminal symbol from the left-hand side of the production, effectively applying the production in reverse.4 The ultimate goal of this process is to reduce the entire input string to the grammar's start symbol, indicating a successful parse.7
A crucial aspect of shift-reduce parsing is the identification of handles and the process of handle pruning.4 A handle is a substring of the current working string (represented on the stack) that matches the right-hand side of a production and is ready for reduction.7 Formally, a handle of a right sentential form u is a production A -> w, and a position within u where the string w can be found and replaced by A.7 Handle pruning is the process of identifying these handles and replacing them with their corresponding left-hand side non-terminals.15 This sequence of reductions effectively traces a rightmost derivation in reverse, starting from the input string and working backwards to the start symbol.15 Correctly identifying the handle at each step is vital for achieving a valid parse.12 Simply choosing the leftmost matching substring for reduction might not always lead to the correct parse.29 The parser ensures that handles appear on the top of the stack before reduction.31
The concept of viable prefixes is also important in shift-reduce parsing.7 Viable prefixes are prefixes of right sentential forms that can appear on the stack of a shift-reduce parser.7 These prefixes do not extend beyond the end of the rightmost handle.7 A shift-reduce parser will only create sequences on the stack that can eventually be reduced to the start symbol.7 This constraint helps the parser avoid pursuing paths that cannot lead to a successful parse.
Despite its power, shift-reduce parsing faces certain challenges, primarily in the form of conflicts.7 Shift-reduce conflicts arise when the parser, in a particular state, cannot decide whether to shift the next input symbol onto the stack or to reduce a sequence of symbols already on the stack.7 A classic example is the "dangling else" problem in programming languages.7 Reduce-reduce conflicts occur when the parser has identified a handle on the stack but has more than one production rule that could be applied for reduction.7 These conflicts often stem from ambiguities in the grammar definition or limitations inherent in the parsing technique.7 Resolving these conflicts is essential for creating a deterministic parser.34 While some parsing techniques, like operator precedence parsing, can sometimes operate with ambiguous grammars, standard shift-reduce parsing, especially in the context of LR parsers, typically requires unambiguous grammars for proper operation.26

Operator Precedence Parsing

Operator precedence parsing is a form of bottom-up parsing that is particularly well-suited for parsing expressions where the operators have clearly defined precedence and associativity.2 This technique is often used in calculators and for parsing arithmetic expressions within larger compilers.38
Operator precedence grammars have specific characteristics.39 They do not allow any production rule to have an epsilon (empty string) on its right-hand side.39 Additionally, no production rule can have two adjacent non-terminal symbols on its right-hand side.39 While most parsing methods require unambiguous grammars, operator precedence parsing can sometimes be applied to ambiguous grammars, although this can lead to complexities.40 These restrictions on the grammar simplify the parsing process by focusing on the terminal symbols, primarily operators and operands, to determine the structure of expressions.41
The core of operator precedence parsing lies in defining precedence relations between pairs of terminal symbols.4 These relations indicate whether one operator has a lower precedence (<.), equal precedence (=.), or higher precedence (.>) than another.4 These precedence relations are derived from the standard associativity and precedence rules of the operators in the language.4 For instance, multiplication typically has higher precedence than addition.
Based on these precedence relations, an operator precedence table is constructed.4 This table is a matrix where rows and columns represent terminal symbols, and the entries in the table define the precedence relation between the corresponding pair of terminals.41 The parser uses this table to guide its shift-reduce decisions. When the parser looks at the top terminal on the stack and the next input terminal, the precedence table dictates whether to shift the input token onto the stack or to reduce a handle that is already on the stack.4
To aid in constructing the operator precedence table, especially when productions involve non-terminals, LEADING and TRAILING sets are computed for each non-terminal.4 For a non-terminal A, the LEADING(A) set contains all terminals that can appear as the first symbol in any string derived from A.4 Similarly, the TRAILING(A) set contains all terminals that can appear as the last symbol in any string derived from A.4 These sets help in establishing precedence relations between a terminal and the terminals that can be derived from a neighboring non-terminal in a production.48 For example, if a production is of the form A -> Bα, where B is a non-terminal and α is any string, then any terminal in LEADING(B) will also be in LEADING(A).50 Algorithms exist to compute these LEADING and TRAILING sets for a given grammar.51
The operator precedence parsing algorithm itself typically involves using a stack and the constructed precedence table.4 The parser starts with a special end-marker symbol on the stack and reads the input string, also terminated by an end-marker.4 It then repeatedly compares the precedence of the top terminal on the stack with the current input terminal.41 Based on the precedence relation, the parser either shifts the input token onto the stack or reduces a handle from the stack according to the grammar rules.4 This process continues until the start symbol is reached or an error is detected.45 While relatively straightforward to implement, operator precedence parsing is limited to grammars that meet the operator grammar conditions and have well-defined operator precedence relations.38

LR Parsing: A Powerful Bottom-Up Approach

LR parsing represents a more powerful and widely used class of bottom-up parsing techniques.2 LR parsers are known for their efficiency, determinism, and ability to handle a broad range of context-free grammars, including those that are not amenable to LL parsing or simpler bottom-up methods.2 The "LR" in LR parsing stands for "Left-to-right scan of the input" and "Rightmost derivation in reverse," indicating the direction of input processing and the type of derivation constructed.4 LR parsers are generally preferred in practice for building compilers for programming languages.9 They can efficiently parse in linear time without backtracking and are capable of detecting syntax errors as early as possible.3 A significant advantage of LR parsers is their ability to handle left-recursive grammars directly, a feature that typically requires grammar transformation in top-down parsing techniques.3
The foundation of LR parsing lies in the concept of LR(0) items.4 An LR(0) item is a production rule from the grammar with a dot placed at some position in the right-hand side.4 The dot signifies how much of the right-hand side of the production has been seen so far during the parsing process.4 For example, for a production A -> XYZ, the possible LR(0) items are A -> •XYZ, A -> X•YZ, A -> XY•Z, and A -> XYZ•. The closure of an item set is a crucial operation in LR parsing.4 The closure of a set of LR(0) items includes all the initial items in the set, as well as any items derived from non-terminals that immediately follow the dot in any of the items.4 This process is applied recursively until no new items can be added to the set.4 LR(0) items and their closures form the states of the LR(0) parsing automaton, which is a deterministic finite automaton that guides the parsing process.23 Each state in the automaton represents a set of possible current states of the parser.23 The closure operation ensures that whenever the parser is in a state expecting a non-terminal, all possible productions starting with that non-terminal are also considered.60
The SLR (Simple LR) parser is the most basic type of LR parser.2 The construction of an SLR parsing table involves first building the LR(0) automaton for the grammar.4 Then, for each state in the automaton, the actions (shift or reduce) are determined based on the current input symbol and the FOLLOW sets of the non-terminals in the grammar.4 Specifically, if a state contains a complete item (i.e., the dot is at the end of the production, like A -> XYZ•), a reduction by that production is performed if the next input symbol is in the FOLLOW set of the non-terminal A.60 SLR parsers are relatively easy to implement but are less powerful than other LR parsers and may not be able to handle all grammars that can be parsed by more sophisticated methods.8 They are more prone to shift-reduce and reduce-reduce conflicts compared to CLR and LALR parsers due to their less precise use of lookahead information.67
The Canonical LR(1) parser (CLR) is the most powerful form of LR parser.2 CLR parsing utilizes LR(1) items, which are LR(0) items augmented with a lookahead terminal.4 An LR(1) item has the form [A -> α•β, a], where a is the lookahead terminal, indicating that if the parser has recognized α and the next input symbol is a, it should proceed as if it is trying to parse a string derivable from A using the production A -> αβ.4 The construction of a CLR parsing table involves building an automaton whose states are sets of LR(1) items.61 Transitions between states are determined by both terminal and non-terminal symbols, taking the lookahead into account.67 A reduction by a production A -> α is performed only if the next input token matches the lookahead terminal associated with the complete LR(1) item [A -> α•, a].61 While CLR parsers can handle a wider range of grammars and resolve more conflicts than SLR parsers because of the precise lookahead information, they often result in a very large number of states and a correspondingly large parsing table, which can be a practical concern.8
The Look-Ahead LR parser (LALR) aims to reduce the size of the parsing table generated by the CLR method without significantly sacrificing parsing power.2 LALR parsing achieves this by merging states in the CLR automaton that have the same core (i.e., the same LR(0) items) but possibly different lookahead sets.8 The lookahead sets of the merged states are then combined.69 The number of states in an LALR parser is typically the same as in an SLR parser, making the parsing table size much more manageable.8 LALR parsers can handle most programming language grammars and are widely used in practice.8 Parser generators like YACC and Bison often produce LALR parsers.8 While merging states can sometimes introduce reduce-reduce conflicts if the merged states have reductions with different lookahead sets that now overlap, it does not introduce new shift-reduce conflicts.67 LALR parsers offer a good compromise between the parsing power of CLR parsers and the table size efficiency of SLR parsers.67

Intermediate Code Generation: Bridging the Gap

Following successful syntax analysis, the compiler proceeds to the intermediate code generation phase. The purpose of intermediate code is to provide a platform-independent representation of the source program.8 This representation facilitates machine-independent code optimization and allows the compiler to be easily adapted to different target architectures by only requiring changes in the code generation phase.8 Intermediate code essentially acts as a bridge between the high-level source code and the low-level machine code.
Several forms of intermediate code representation exist. Prefix and postfix notations are linear representations of expressions that eliminate the need for parentheses to specify the order of operations.8 Postfix notation, also known as Reverse Polish Notation (RPN), is particularly useful for evaluating expressions using a stack-based approach.8
Another common form of intermediate representation is three-address code, which can be represented in various ways, including quadruples, triples, and indirect triples.8 In quadruples, each instruction typically has an operator, two operands, and a result, often represented as four fields.8 Triples are similar but omit the explicit result field; the result of an operation is implicitly referred to by its position in the triple structure.8 This reduces redundancy compared to quadruples. Indirect triples further optimize this by using a list of pointers to triples, which allows for easier rearrangement of code during optimization.8 These three-address code representations break down complex expressions and statements into a sequence of elementary operations, each involving at most three addresses (two for operands and one for the result), making them suitable for various compiler optimizations.72
Syntax trees, and more specifically abstract syntax trees (ASTs), provide a hierarchical representation of the program's syntactic structure.8 Nodes in the tree represent operators, operands, or control flow constructs, illustrating the relationships between different parts of the program.8 ASTs are a more compact form of syntax trees, omitting some syntactic details that are not essential for subsequent compiler phases like semantic analysis and intermediate code generation.18
The process of evaluating expressions during intermediate code generation typically involves breaking down complex expressions into a sequence of three-address instructions.8 Temporary variables are often introduced to store the intermediate results of these computations.8 This step-by-step translation into three-address code provides a uniform and simplified representation for further processing and optimization.72
Attribute grammars provide a formal mechanism for associating semantic information with the syntax of a program.8 They extend context-free grammars by attaching attributes to the grammar symbols and defining rules for computing the values of these attributes. Synthesized attributes are computed from the attributes of the children of a node in the parse tree and are typically used to pass information up the tree.8 Inherited attributes, on the other hand, are computed from the attributes of the parent and/or siblings of a node and are used to pass information down the tree.8 Attribute grammars enable the compiler to perform semantic analysis, such as type checking, and to generate intermediate code in a syntax-directed manner, ensuring consistency between the program's structure and its meaning.
Various intermediate languages are used in practice, such as P-code (historically used in Pascal compilers), JVM bytecode (for Java), and LLVM Intermediate Representation (IR).8 These languages are designed to be at a level of abstraction that allows for both effective optimization and relatively straightforward translation into machine code for different target architectures. The choice of intermediate language can influence the efficiency of the compilation process and the performance of the final executable code.
The translation of high-level language constructs into intermediate code is a systematic process.8 Declarations of variables involve allocating storage and associating types with the declared identifiers. Assignment statements are translated into instructions that compute the value of the expression on the right-hand side and store it in the memory location associated with the variable on the left-hand side. Boolean expressions are often translated into conditional jump instructions or represented using a boolean value that can be tested. Case statements can be implemented using a series of conditional jumps or a jump table, depending on the number of cases. Backpatching is a technique used to handle forward references, particularly in control flow statements where the target of a jump instruction may not be known when the instruction is first generated.8 Procedure calls involve setting up an activation record on the runtime stack, passing parameters to the called procedure, and handling the return value after the procedure completes execution.8

Code Generation: From Intermediate to Target Code

The code generation phase is the final stage in the compiler's front-end, where the intermediate code is translated into the target machine code. Several key considerations guide the design of a code generator.8 Instruction selection involves choosing the appropriate sequence of target machine instructions to implement the operations specified in the intermediate code. This often requires considering the specific instruction set of the target processor. Register allocation is a critical task that aims to keep frequently used variables in the processor's registers, which offer much faster access times compared to main memory.8 Efficient register allocation can significantly impact the performance of the generated code. Instruction scheduling involves ordering the generated machine instructions to optimize for the processor's pipeline execution, aiming to reduce pipeline stalls and improve overall throughput.
A thorough understanding of the target machine's architecture is essential for effective code generation.8 This includes knowledge of the number and types of registers available, the instruction set and the different addressing modes supported, as well as the organization and hierarchy of the memory system.
Runtime storage management is another important aspect.8 The code generator must ensure that memory is allocated correctly for different data types and program structures. This involves handling both static and dynamic storage allocation, as well as managing the call stack for procedure calls, which is used to store information related to active function invocations, such as parameters, local variables, and return addresses.
A simple code generation algorithm typically involves traversing the intermediate code representation, instruction by instruction.8 For each intermediate code instruction, the algorithm selects the corresponding target machine instructions, taking into account the available registers and the memory organization.8
To facilitate efficient code generation, compilers often use register descriptors and address descriptors.8 A register descriptor keeps track of the values that are currently stored in each of the processor's registers. An address descriptor, for each variable in the program, keeps track of the location(s) where the current value of that variable can be found, which might be in one or more registers, in main memory, or both.8 By effectively utilizing these descriptors, the code generator can make informed decisions about register usage, avoid redundant loads and stores of data, and ultimately produce more optimized target code.

Code Optimization: Enhancing Performance

Code optimization is a crucial phase in the compilation process that aims to improve the performance of the generated code by making it more efficient in terms of execution speed, memory usage, or both.8 This phase typically involves applying various transformations to the intermediate code representation. Several principal sources of optimization exist.8 These include redundant computations, inefficient use of temporary variables, unused code, opportunities for constant evaluation at compile time, and inefficient loop structures.8
Function Preserving Transformations are a class of optimizations that improve the code without altering the functionality of the program.72 Eliminating common subexpressions involves identifying multiple occurrences of the same computation and replacing them with a single calculation, storing the result for reuse.72 Copy propagation replaces uses of a variable with the value of another variable that it was recently assigned, which can sometimes lead to the elimination of dead code.72 Dead code elimination removes code that is never executed or whose result is never used.72 Constant folding evaluates constant expressions at compile time rather than during runtime.72
Loop Optimization techniques are particularly important as programs often spend a significant portion of their execution time within loops.72 Code motion involves moving loop-invariant computations (expressions whose values do not change within the loop) outside the loop.72 Induction variable elimination identifies and replaces redundant induction variables, which are variables whose value is predictably related to the loop counter.72 Reduction in strength replaces expensive operations within a loop with equivalent but cheaper operations, such as replacing multiplication with addition.72
Peephole optimization is a technique that focuses on making local improvements by examining a small window of consecutive instructions in the target code and replacing inefficient sequences with shorter or faster equivalents.8 This can include eliminating redundant loads and stores or utilizing machine-specific instructions for better performance.
Global Data Flow Analysis is a more advanced optimization technique that collects information about how data flows through the program across basic blocks.8 A program is first divided into basic blocks, which are sequences of instructions with a single entry and a single exit point.8 These basic blocks are then connected to form a flow graph, representing the control flow of the program.8 By analyzing how data is defined and used throughout the flow graph, the compiler can perform more sophisticated optimizations like global common subexpression elimination and global dead code elimination.72 Efficient algorithms exist for performing this global data flow analysis.8
Finally, the compiler must consider the Runtime Environments in which the generated code will execute.8 This involves addressing source language-specific issues like dynamic typing or garbage collection, deciding on strategies for storage organization (static, stack-based, heap-based), and understanding the role and structure of activation records used in managing function calls.8 The compiler's code generation and optimization phases must work in concert with the runtime environment to ensure the correct and efficient execution of the program.

Conclusions

The process of compiling a program involves a complex interplay of different phases, each contributing to the transformation of source code into executable instructions. Syntax analysis, particularly bottom-up parsing techniques like shift-reduce, operator precedence, and LR parsing, forms a critical foundation by verifying the program's grammatical correctness and constructing a structured representation. This representation then serves as the basis for intermediate code generation, which provides a platform-independent form suitable for optimization. Finally, code generation translates this intermediate form into machine-specific instructions, and the optimization phase enhances the efficiency and performance of the resulting code. The choice of parsing technique, the design of the intermediate representation, and the application of various optimization strategies are all crucial factors that influence the overall quality and efficiency of the compiled program.

Works cited

1. Difference Between Top Down and Bottom Up Parsing, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.shiksha.com/online-courses/articles/difference-between-top-down-and-bottom-up-parsing-blogId-158057
2. Bottom-up parsing - Wikipedia, accessed May 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom-up_parsing
3. Difference Between Top Down Parsing and Bottom Up Parsing - GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/difference-between-top-down-parsing-and-bottom-up-parsing/
4. Bottom-up Parsers | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/bottom-up-or-shift-reduce-parsers-set-2/
5. Compiler design - Lecture 6: Bottom-Up Parsing, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~cs520/2022/slides/6-bottom-up-parsing.pdf
6. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom-up_parsing#:~:text=In%20computer%20science%2C%20parsing%20reveals,level%20overall%20structure%20to%20last.
7. web.stanford.edu, accessed May 5, 2025, https://web.stanford.edu/class/archive/cs/cs143/cs143.1128/handouts/100%20Bottom-Up%20Parsing.pdf
8. Bottom-Up Parser in Compiler Design - Tutorialspoint, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.tutorialspoint.com/compiler_design/compiler_design_bottom_up_parser.htm
9. Introduction to Bottom-Up Parsing, accessed May 5, 2025, https://user.it.uu.se/~kostis/Teaching/KT1-11/Slides/handout06.pdf
10. Bottom-up parsing - CS [45]12[01] Spring 2023 - Cornell University, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs4120/2023sp/notes.html?id=bottomup
11. Bottom up parsing - GitHub Pages, accessed May 5, 2025, https://karkare.github.io/cs335/lectures/07BottomUpParsing.pdf
12. Working of Bottom up parser | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/working-of-bottom-up-parser/
13. Top-Down and Bottom-Up Parsing, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.cs.oberlin.edu/~bob/cs331/Class%20Notes/February/February%205/TopDownBottomUp.pdf
14. Bottom-Up Parsing An Introductory Example, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.d.umn.edu/~rmaclin/cs5641/Notes/Lecture8.pdf
15. kcsrk.info, accessed May 5, 2025, https://kcsrk.info/cs3300_m22/slides/04_bottom_up_parsing.pdf
16. Lecture 18: Aug. 26,28 2019 18.1 Bottom-up Parsing - KR Chowdhary, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.krchowdhary.com/compiler/lt11.pdf
17. Shift Reduce Parser in Compiler - GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/shift-reduce-parser-compiler/
18. Reduction & Handle Pruning | PPT - SlideShare, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/compiler-238405760/238405760
19. BOTTOM-UP PARSING, accessed May 5, 2025, https://ggnindia.dronacharya.info/Downloads/Sub-info/PPT/Compiler-Design/Unit-II/5-Bottom-Up-Parser.pdf
20. Bottom-up Parsing - BCE Bhagalpur, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.bcebhagalpur.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Compiler_Parsing.pdf
21. Shift-reduce parser - Wikipedia, accessed May 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shift-reduce_parser
22. Shift reduce parser | PPT - SlideShare, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/shift-reduce-parser/232108597
23. Introduction to Shift-Reduce Parsing, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.gm.th-koeln.de/~ehses/compiler/parsdemo-1.1/srintro.html
24. What is Shift Reduce Parser - Tutorialspoint, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.tutorialspoint.com/what-is-shift-reduce-parser
25. Limitations of LL vs LR parsers? - Stack Overflow, accessed May 5, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5467244/limitations-of-ll-vs-lr-parsers
26. Bottom Up Parsers Part-1 | Parsing | Shift Reduce Parser | Compiler Design - YouTube, accessed May 5, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SemmXpNeTx4&pp=ygUTI3NoaWZ0cmVkdWNlcGFyc2luZw%3D%3D
27. Bottom Up Parsing Handle and Reduction || Lesson 26 || Compiler Design || Learning Monkey || - YouTube, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZuDi6QlBcA
28. Understanding Handle and Handle Pruning | Coconote, accessed May 5, 2025, https://coconote.app/notes/72d95f65-3833-4b43-a317-488fbfeae169
29. What is Handle Pruning? - GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/what-is-handle-pruning/
30. Handle and handle pruning in Compiler Design | Bottomup parsing - YouTube, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRqLcvPn9pw
31. In shift reduce parsing why the handle always eventually appear on top of the stack and never inside?, accessed May 5, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66725724/in-shift-reduce-parsing-why-the-handle-always-eventually-appear-on-top-of-the-st
32. 21. HANDLE AND HANDLE PRUNING IN COMPILER DESIGN || EXAMPLES - YouTube, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC-OOuOtfq4
33. www.geeksforgeeks.org, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/what-is-handle-pruning/#:~:text=Removing%20the%20children%20of%20the,be%20obtained%20by%20handle%20pruning.
34. Shift-Reduce Parsing: Techniques and Challenges, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.toolify.ai/ai-news/shiftreduce-parsing-techniques-and-challenges-660231
35. Conflicts in Shift Reduce Parsing | Syntax Analyzer | Lec 55 | #Compiler Design - YouTube, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3LH1A7Zsgw
36. Attempting to resolve shift-reduce parsing issue - Stack Overflow, accessed May 5, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32774458/attempting-to-resolve-shift-reduce-parsing-issue
37. 7. What are the disadvantages of shift reduce parsing. Perform shift reduce parsing of string w= (x-x) -(x/x) for given grammar. E→ E-E | E/E | (E) | x - Old Questions - Collegenote, accessed May 5, 2025, https://collegenote.net/question-answer/compiler-design-and-construction-207810-24749
38. Operator-precedence parser - Wikipedia, accessed May 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operator-precedence_parser
39. Operator Precedence Grammar | PDF | Parsing | Formalism (Deductive) - Scribd, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/384578359/Operator-precedence-grammar-doc
40. Operator grammar and precedence parser in TOC - GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/operator-grammar-and-precedence-parser-in-toc/
41. Operator-Precedence Parsing (OPP), accessed May 5, 2025, https://ggnindia.dronacharya.info/Downloads/Sub-info/PPT/Compiler-Design/Unit-II/6-Operator-Precedence-Parsing.pdf
42. 7-Operator Precedence Parser-23-05-2023.pptx - SlideShare, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/7operator-precedence-parser23052023pptx/259011120
43. What is Operator Precedence Parsing - Tutorialspoint, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.tutorialspoint.com/what-is-operator-precedence-parsing
44. A simple Operator Precedence parser - Vidar Hokstad, accessed May 5, 2025, https://hokstad.com/operator-precedence-parser
45. Operator Precedence Parser | Bottom-Up Parser | Syntax Analyzer Phase | Compiler Design, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs8GZeK2xsk
46. Operator Precedence Parsing || Lesson 36 || Compiler Design || Learning Monkey || - YouTube, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KV92SnTV_I0
47. Operator-precedence parser : r/Compilers - Reddit, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Compilers/comments/b59p4d/operatorprecedence_parser/
48. MODULE 12 – LEADING, TRAILING and Operator Precedence Table - e-PG Pathshala, accessed May 5, 2025, https://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in/epgpdata/uploads/epgp_content/S000007CS/P001069/M017515/ET/1474627013Module12_Content_final.pdf
49. Leading and Trailing in Ambiguous Operator Precedence grammar parsing - Stack Overflow, accessed May 5, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66881629/leading-and-trailing-in-ambiguous-operator-precedence-grammar-parsing
50. www.tutorialspoint.com, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.tutorialspoint.com/what-are-leading-and-trailing-operation-of-an-operator-precedence-grammar#:~:text=Leading%20and%20Trailing%20Operations%20of%20Operator%20Precedence%20Grammar,-Compiler%20DesignProgramming&text=If%20production%20is%20of%20form%20A%20%E2%86%92%20B%CE%B1%2C%20if%20a,be%20in%20LEADING%20(A).&text=If%20production%20is%20of%20form%20A%20%E2%86%92%20%CE%B1B.,be%20in%20TRAILING%20(A).
51. Leading and Trailing Operations of Operator Precedence Grammar - Tutorialspoint, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.tutorialspoint.com/what-are-leading-and-trailing-operation-of-an-operator-precedence-grammar
52. Computing leading and trailing sets for context-free grammar - Stack Overflow, accessed May 5, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28397767/computing-leading-and-trailing-sets-for-context-free-grammar
53. Understanding LEADING and TRAILING operations of an operator precedence grammar, accessed May 5, 2025, https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/4716/understanding-leading-and-trailing-operations-of-an-operator-precedence-grammar
54. Leading and Trailing in Compiler Design | Example | Operator Precedence Parsing | PART 1.23 - YouTube, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmZwIGleTyc
55. Is a LR parser a shift-reduce parser, or is a shift-reduce parser a LR parser? - Reddit, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Compilers/comments/hnh8yk/is_a_lr_parser_a_shiftreduce_parser_or_is_a/
56. LR Parser Basics: What is LR Paeser? - Vemeko FPGA, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.vemeko.com/blog/lr-parser-basics-what-is-lr-parser.html
57. LR parser - Wikipedia, accessed May 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LR_parser
58. Why We Need to Know LR and Recursive Descent Parsing Techniques - tratt.net, accessed May 5, 2025, https://tratt.net/laurie/blog/2023/why_we_need_to_know_lr_and_recursive_descent_parsing_techniques.html
59. LR Parser | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/lr-parser/
60. SLR Parser (with Examples) - GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/slr-parser-with-examples/
61. LR Parsing Table Construction, accessed May 5, 2025, https://web.eecs.umich.edu/~weimerw/2009-4610/lectures/weimer-4610-09.pdf
62. What are the advantages of LR parsers? : r/Compilers - Reddit, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Compilers/comments/z3w68j/what_are_the_advantages_of_lr_parsers/
63. How should I go about building a simple LR parser? - Stack Overflow, accessed May 5, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2321022/how-should-i-go-about-building-a-simple-lr-parser
64. Tableless LR Parser : r/Compilers - Reddit, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Compilers/comments/1disulp/tableless_lr_parser/
65. What are the 'practical' advantages of LR parser over LL parser 'in today'?, accessed May 5, 2025, https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/419368/what-are-the-practical-advantages-of-lr-parser-over-ll-parser-in-today
66. LR Parsers, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.csd.uwo.ca/~mmorenom/CS447/Lectures/Syntax.html/node29.html
67. SLR, CLR and LALR Parsers - GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/slr-clr-and-lalr-parsers-set-3/
68. What advantages do LL parsers have over LR parsers? - Stack Overflow, accessed May 5, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4092280/what-advantages-do-ll-parsers-have-over-lr-parsers
69. How LALR parsers are more Powerful than SLR : r/Compilers - Reddit, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Compilers/comments/sfcbcj/how_lalr_parsers_are_more_powerful_than_slr/
70. What are the main advantages and disadvantages of LL and LR parsing?, accessed May 5, 2025, https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/19541/what-are-the-main-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-ll-and-lr-parsing
71. LL and LR in Context: Why Parsing Tools Are Hard - Josh Haberman, accessed May 5, 2025, https://blog.reverberate.org/2013/09/ll-and-lr-in-context-why-parsing-tools.html
72. Optimization of Basic Blocks | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/optimization-of-basic-blocks/
73. code optimization and code generation - Sri Vidya College of Engineering & Technology, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.srividyaengg.ac.in/coursematerial/CSE/104635.pdf
74. Code Optimization in Compiler Design | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/code-optimization-in-compiler-design/
75. Principal sources of optimization, Optimization of Basic blocks Code generation: Issues in the design of a co - WordPress.com, accessed May 5, 2025, https://itsmeebin.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/module-6.pdf
76. UNIT VI CODE OPTIMIZATION Introduction - WordPress.com, accessed May 5, 2025, https://anilkumarprathipati.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/cd-unit-vi.pdf
77. Code Optimization In this module, we will understand the function preserving transformations and loop optimization - e-PG Pathshala, accessed May 5, 2025, https://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in/epgpdata/uploads/epgp_content/S000007CS/P001069/M020251/ET/1495622068Module34_Content_final.pdf
78. Code Improvement Criteria - WordPress.com, accessed May 5, 2025, https://smkfit.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/compiler-notes-unit-v.pdf
79. Function Transformation - YouTube, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAsHRjUYdew
80. PRINCIPAL SOURCES OF OPTIMISATION - Rohini College of Engineering & Technology, accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.rcet.org.in/uploads/academics/rohini_79541034505.pdf
81. Code Optimization – Compiler Design, accessed May 5, 2025, https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/csp10/chapter/code-optimization/